Legal Opinion

Goeldner v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided March 9, 2020No. 4:19-cv-00692Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ERICH GOELDNER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:19-cv-00692-NKL ) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD ) COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Plaintiff’s complaint alleges four claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.: disparate treatment, disparate impact, unlawful medical inquiries, and failure to accommodate.1 Doc. 1 (Complaint). Plaintiff’s claims arise from Defendant’s determination under its internal medical policy that Plaintiff was unfit to return to work following shoulder…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API