Legal Opinion

Hidden v. Chappel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The plaintiff, who is guardian for William Henry Fairman, an incompetent person, sues to recover a sum of money claimed to be due to the ward on a sale of land to the defendant by one Iliram Fairman. The evidence for the plaintiff is as follows:

Mrs. Lydia Fairman testified:

• “Iliram Fairman was my son. He is now dead. William Henry Fairman is my. son, and is now living. My son, William Henry Fairman, had some property left by my husband ; a small piece of land which had been set out to him. He had some money from his father’s estate. Never had any money after his father’s death,only a little…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pipp v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Hunt v. StrewMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Palmer v. BrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Peoples Savings Bank v. GeistertMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Knights of the Modern Maccabees v. SharpMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Edwards v. ThomanMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API