Legal Opinion

Percifield v. Foutz

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1955No. 3825PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Eather, J.:

This is an action for damages for alleged injuries temporary and permanent arising out of alleged negligence in the conduct of the defendant-respondent, in the extraction of a wisdom tooth from the mouth of plaintiff-appellant. The prayer is for a total of $39,300 and for other and further relief. The parties will be referred to as they were designated in the lower court.

Plaintiff alleged that defendant broke a saw-type drill, called a burr, in the course of the extraction and caused the same to be lodged in the jaw bone of the plaintiff; that the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matuschka v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Morris v. WeeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lockart v. MacLeanNevada Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Lockart v. MacLeanNevada Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API