State v. Broadhead

GUTIERREZ, Judge.

Mitchell Larry Broadhead appeals from his judgment of conviction and sentences on three counts of aggravated assault. Broad-head argues that the district court erred by allowing an alternate juror to be present during deliberations and by failing to instruct the jury on the requisite mens rea. Additionally, Broadhead argues that his sentences are illegal and excessive. We affirm.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Broadhead was driving his vehicle in a field near a school, trying to catch his dog. The dog ran to some boys, who detained the dog. Broadhead engaged in a hostile…