Legal Opinion
United States v. Enrique Auch, A/K/A Rickie Auch
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided August 26, 1999No. 97-1825PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAVITCH, Senior Circuit Judge.
This appeal requires us to address whether a prosecutor’s various errors and acts of misconduct throughout the course of a criminal trial require reversal. Although we find fault with a number of the prosecutor’s tactics in this case, we conclude that none of these errors supports reversal under the applicable standards of review. Accordingly, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Enrique “Rickie” Auch stood trial for armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), robbery affecting commerce in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), and carrying a firearm during…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. InnamoratiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. DohertyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. Perez-RuizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Jose Ramon Hernandez, United States of America v. Douglas Gorbea Del-ValleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- United States v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. MooneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Charles PalmerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.