Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Burza

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 30, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

The parties before the court are the public administrator of the county of New York, as administrator of the estate of John Burza, deceased (referred to as the husband), Sophie Melnick, as administratrix of the estate of Sophie Burza, deceased (referred to as the wife), and Stefan Ferens, as ancillary administrator of the estate of John Burza, also known as Jan Burza (referred to as the father), who is the father of the John Burza referred to herein as the husband.

The husband at the time of his death was an employee of National Biscuit Company and there was outstanding on Ms life…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. St. John v. Andrews Institute for GirlsNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Stannard v. . HubbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Fuller v. LinzeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Dunn v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bennett v. BennettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. In re the Estate of PothNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  3. McKinney v. DepoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  4. In re the Estate of ConoverNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965
  5. Kindleberger v. Lincoln Nat. Bank of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API