Legal Opinion

Groeger v. Col-Les Orthopedic Associates, P. C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The court improvidently exercised its discretion by granting the motion of defendant Wierzbieniec for a protective order precluding use of a notice to admit upon the ground that the statements had already been admitted at a pretrial deposition. Use of both a deposition and notice to admit is not barred by statute (CPLR 3123; compare, CPLR 3130 [1]), and each device serves a distinct purpose. The pretrial deposition is utilized to discover facts, whereas the notice to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johantgen v. Hobart Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Berg v. Flower Fifth Avenue HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Villa v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Spawton v. James E. Strates Shows, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Central Nassau Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v. GEICOAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API