State, Department of Human Services v. Hamilton
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this action, instituted by the Department of Human Services of the State, the trial judge declared Pamela I. Hamilton, age 12, a dependent and neglected child within the meaning of T.C.A. § 37-202(6)(iv) 1 on the ground that her natural guardian, her father, had refused to provide necessary medical care for the child. The father has appealed.
Due to the exigencies of the situation, we have suspended certain requirements of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure, as authorized by T.R.A.P., Rule 2, but have received briefs and oral arguments have been heard.
Following an evidentiary…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Superintendent of Belchertown State School v. SaikewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Custody of a MinorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Mitchell v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- State, Department of Human Services v. NorthernCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by20 opinions
- Hawk v. HawkTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Carrington H.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- In Re EGIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- In re Navada N.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.