State v. Hobson
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
After a trial to a jury, the defendant was convicted of larceny in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-119 (8) and § 53a-124.1 In this appeal from that judgment, she claims that the trial court erred in three respects: (1) in refusing to suppress the fruits of two searches of her home; (2) in failing to declare a mistrial because of alleged jury miscon*15duct; and (3) in denying her motion for judgment of acquittal based on insufficiency of the evidence. We find no error.
When ruling on the defendant’s motion to suppress, the trial court could reasonably have found the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. RuscoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- In re Adalberto S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. GagnonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- State v. BlackwellConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- State v. FosterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.