Hodecker v. Stricker
New York Supreme Court
Action by Anna Hodecker against Emma Strieker for an injunction. Defendant demurs to the complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.
The plaintiff, in her complaint, alleges that she is the lawful wife of Frederick Hodecker; that the defendant, with knowledge of this, resides with him, in relations immoral and meretricious, and assumes to bear the surname of Hodecker, and that such appropriation of the plaintiff’s name of Hodecker, by thus falsely personating her, is calculated to prejudice the plaintiff’s standing in the community, as well as to scandalize and injure her in name and fame, as the lawful wife of the said Frederick Hodecker; and that “by reason of the premises the plaintiff has been scandalized, slandered,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Foley v. PhelpsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Schuyler v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Clifford v. . KampfeNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Clifford v. KampfeNew York Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baumann v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Bartholomew v. WorkmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Kuhn v. HemmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Baumann v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Oppenheim v. KridelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.