Legal Opinion

Mutter v. Wood

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1988No. C-6479PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAUZY, Justice.

This mandamus proceeding arises out of a medical malpractice action. The trial judge, Honorable Sharolyn P. Wood, ordered the Mutters to sign an authorization permitting the defendant-hospital’s attorney to discuss the medical care and treatment of their deceased son with the treating physicians and health care providers. The authorization does not require that the physicians talk with the hospital’s attorney but “removes any claim of privilege” the Mutters might have. Under the particular facts of this case, we hold that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martinez v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Travelers Insurance Company v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. R.K. v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. James v. KloosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. In Re Nance, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  5. Hogue v. Kroger Store No. 107, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API