State v. Santana-Lopez
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.
¶ 1. Miguel Angel Santana-Lopez appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree sexual assault of a child, see *334Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1).1 He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in preventing him from testifying that he offered to take a DNA test. We agree and remand for further proceedings.
I
¶ 2. Santana-Lopez, now fifty years old, was charged and convicted of forcibly licking, and penetrating with his finger, the vaginal area of the six-year-old granddaughter of the woman with whom he lived. On the second day of trial, the prosecutor…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. PharrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Mario Biaggi, Stanley Simon, Richard Biaggi, Peter Neglia, John Mariotta, and Bernard EhrlichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Reiman Associates, Inc. v. R/A Advertising, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- State v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ramaker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- State v. ShombergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Rowland v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Rollins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- People v. MunizColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.