Legal Opinion

City of Camden

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided July 25, 1906No. 1,119PublishedCited by 16 opinions

In Admiralty. In the matter of the claim of T. T. Tunstall, intervener, for money lent or advanced.

1Opinion of the Court

TOULMIN, District Judge.

It is well settled that, by the general maritime law, one who loans or advances money to the master or *848owner of a vessel, who is without funds, in a foreign port, to be used in furnishing materials, repairs, or supplies to the vessel, and which is actually used for that purpose, is entitled to a maritime lien on the vessel therefor; and that where funds are loaned in a foreign port to discharge valid existing maritime liens, and are so used, the lender may properly and equitably stand in the place of the lien-holders whose demands have been discharged with the funds…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The Emily SouderSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. The KateSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. The IrisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
  4. Pittman v. The Samuel MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  5. The Guiding StarUnited States Circuit Court · 1883

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Payne v. SS Tropic BreezeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  2. Compagnia Maritima La Empresa, S.A. v. Rod PickardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  3. GydaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1916
  4. The CimbriaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
  5. The PuritanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API