Legal Opinion

Fowler v. Latham

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 6, 1946No. 15436PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Under the record now before us, three questions present themselves : First, did the plaintiff comply with the adjudication of this court by introducing sufficient evidence to go to the jury with respect to the execution of the alleged original unrecorded deed from Mrs. McDonald to G. W. Latham, wherein the interest of G. W. Latham was limited to a life estate with remainder over to his children, the plaintiffs in this case? Second, if the existence of such original deed should be taken as established in the mind of the jury, did…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Blakely Oil & Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Bean v. BarronSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Fussell v. DennardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. HartleyDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1967
  2. Southern Development Co. v. Shepco Paving, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Chicagoland Vending, Inc. v. Parkside Center, Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  4. Roberts v. GunterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  5. Fowler v. LathamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API