Legal Opinion
Bean v. Barron
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided January 13, 1933No. 8949PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. “When parties are furnished with a list of the jury, it is their duty, if they know that any of the jurors are disqualified, to call attention to the same, or the disqualification will be held to have been waived. If they have reasonable grounds to suspect that any of the jurors are disqualified, it is their duty to call attention to the fact, so that due inquiry may be made of the panel.” Moore v. Farmers Mutual Ins. Asso., 107 Ga. 199 (2), 209 (33 S. E. 65).
2. “‘The law imputes to the principal, and charges him with, all notice or knowledge relating to the subject-matter of the agency…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- German American Mutual Life Ass'n v. FarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Hawkins v. StuddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Moore v. Farmers' Mutual Insurance Asso.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Martin & Sons v. Bank of LeesburgSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Savell v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Dunlap v. Citizens & Southern DeKalb BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Geiger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Ford Motor Co. v. ConleySupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Roylston v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.