Legal Opinion

Kurker v. Shoestring Properties Ltd. Partnership

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 12, 2007No. 06-P-161PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMills, J.

The plaintiff, Wayne Kurker, sought specific performance of either a final offer to purchase (final OTP) or a subsequent purchase and sale agreement concerning land in Hyannis used as a marina. After a seven-day trial, jury waived, a Superior Court judge found that the final OTP contained all *645material terms of an agreement for the sale, and that the final OTP reflected the intention of the parties to be bound by their agreement. However, the judge went on to state that the final OTP was subject to the execution of a purchase and sale agreement, which, though executed by the parties, was held…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Situation Management Systems, Inc. v. Malouf, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Rosenfield v. United States Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. McCarthy v. TobinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. City of Haverhill v. George Brox, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  5. Jordan v. LavinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coviello v. RichardsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  2. Ferguson v. MaximMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  3. Ritter v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API