Legal Opinion
Rales v. Rales
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 28, 2006No. Nos. 04-FM-443, 04-FM-444PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Senior Judge:
These consolidated appeals arise from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s “Motion to Compel [Appellee’s] Compliance with Custody Agreement” without first conducting an evidentiary hearing, and from the court’s subsequent denial of appellant’s “Motion for Disqualification of [Counsel]” as moot. We affirm both rulings.
I
A. The Custody Agreement and Family Therapy
The primary issue in this case involves the parties’ course of action with regard to family therapy. Appellant Christine Rales and appellee Steven Rales, who were divorced in early 2003, executed a custody…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Frederick Hoptowit v. John SpellmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Western Electric Company, Inc. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Bellsouth Corporation, Bell Atlantic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- In Re MorrisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re: Petition of J.O. & P.O.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017