Garland v. Saul

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID G., 7 Case No. 19-cv-03308-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR 9 SUMMARY JUDGMENT ANDREW M. SAUL, 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 27 Defendant. 11 12 Plaintiff David G. moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the Social 13 Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which found 14 Plaintiff not disabled and therefore denied his application for benefits under Titles II and XVI of 15 the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. § 401

et seq. [Docket No. 18.] The Commissioner…