Poynter v. Fargo
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
— Respondent sued to foreclose a material-man’s and mechanic’s lien under C. S., chap. 267 (secs. 7339-7382). Appellant denied that White, who contracted for the labor and materials, was the owner of the lots sought to be subjected to the lien; urged that he (appellant) had two mortgages on the premises to which the claimed liens were inferior and that no such lien for sewer construction is authorized under our statute.
As to the latter point first, a liberal construction of C. S., sees. 7339 and 7343 (Phillips v. Salmon River Min. Co., 9 Ida. 149, 72 Pac. 886; Armitage v. Bernheim, 32 Ida.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chamberlain v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Phillips v. Salmon River Mining & Development Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1903
- Gunter v. LudlamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Parker v. Northwestern Investment Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Williams, Belser & Co. v. RowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dybvig v. WillisIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- J. R. Christ Construction Co. v. Willete AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- White v. Constitution Mining & Milling Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1936