Legal Opinion

Board of County Commissioners v. Knight

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 10, 1978No. 49,226PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Abbott, J.:

This case primarily involves the sufficiency of publication service in a tax foreclosure sale.

The defendants, Martha Ellen Knight and Jack Knight, are mother and son. Martha Ellen Knight is the record owner of the real property involved in this action. Jack Knight owns no interest in the real property in question and claims no interest. He was apparently listed as a defendant in the tax foreclosure suit out of an abundance of caution. All of the parties admit that Martha Ellen Knight is the owner of record of the subject property. The appellees, Charles E. Mahany and Terry M.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Chapin v. AylwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Weaver v. FrazeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rivera Báez v. Jaume AndújarSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2002
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. AkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. Board of Leavenworth County Comm'rs v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
  4. Board of Jefferson County Commissioners v. AdcoxCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  5. J.A. Tobin Construction Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API