Legal Opinion

State v. . McIntosh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

INDICTMENT tried at Fall Term, 1884, of the Superior Court of Moore comity, before Shepherd, Judge. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court. After conviction the defendant moved in arrest of judgment. Motion overruled. Judgment. Appeal by defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtAshe, J.

This was an indictment tried before Shepherd, Judge, at the Fall Term, 1884, of Moore Superior Court.

The defendant was indicted under the statute — The Code, §1113 — for attempt to destroy the reputation of one V. F. Fry, an innocent woman, by charging her with incontinencv. The indictment upon which defendant was tried is as follows, to-wit: “The jurors upon their oath present, that John A. McIntosh, late of said county of Moore, on the 1st day of January, 1884, with force and arms, at and in the county of Moore, unlawfully, maliciously and wantonly contriving, attempting and intending, to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. State v. . McDanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. State v. . AldridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. State v. . BallangeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. State v. . ShadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. State v. FeebackCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. State v. . FoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API