Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Federal Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 21, 1992No. 1 CA-CV 90-376PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company (“Hartford”) appeals from the trial court's order, granting summary judgment in favor of Federal Insurance Company (“Federal”). We reverse and remand to the trial court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On September 28, 1984, Tibshraeny Brothers Construction, Inc. (“TBC”) became the prime contractor for the construction of certain additions to a Phoenix medical center complex. Federal provided TBC with a payment bond in order to comply with A.R.S. § 33-1003. The prime contract and the payment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United Bank of Arizona v. AllynCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  2. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance v. JamesArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Arizona State Board of Accountancy v. KeeblerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. Smith Pipe & Steel Co. v. MeadArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Matter of Estate of KerrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Baker v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. Campbell v. SZL Properties, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. Lewis v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Aaron v. FromkinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. Tenet Healthsystem TGH, Inc. v. SilverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API