Legal Opinion
United States v. Felipe Lothridge
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 11, 2003No. 02-3642PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Felipe Lothridge was convicted of possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine. Previously, we remanded his appeal to the District Court 1 with instructions to undertake de novo review of the objected-to magistrate judge findings as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (2000). See United States v. Lothridge, 324 F.3d 599 (8th Cir.2003). We retained jurisdiction over the appeal. On remand, the District Court performed the required de novo review, made findings of fact and reached conclusions of law, and again denied Lothridge’s motion to suppress evidence. We affirm.
We…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Charles FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Felipe LothridgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Andre GreenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Lamont O. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. FarishCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Chris WelchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. HessmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.