Legal Opinion
R.D. Bischoff v. Quong-Watkins Properties
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 1987No. 16768PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTLEY, Judge,
Pro Tern.
R.D. Bischoff appeals the district court’s amended judgment denying recovery for his real estate broker services rendered to Paul Quong. Bischoff’s performance was pursuant to an oral agreement with Quong. He contends that the district court erred in construing the oral agreement, further asserting that the district court should have required Quong to compensate him for the reasonable value of his services. For reasons explained below, we affirm.
R.D. Bischoff is a Boise real estate broker. Paul Quong is a real estate developer from California and is a general partner…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Rasmussen v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- Johnson v. Allied Stores Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
- International Engineering Co. v. Daum Industries, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Peavey v. PellandiniIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Pérez Marrero v. Colegio de Cirujanos Dentistas de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1992
- Electrical Wholesale Supply Co. v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Magic Valley Radiology Associates v. Professional Business Services, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Corder v. Idaho Farmway, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- Estate of Hull v. WilliamsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.