Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Luster
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 5, 1993No. 2-92-192-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LATTIMORE, Justice.
Luster filed a pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus seeking dismissal of his indictment on the ground that the statute under which he was charged is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the facts alleged in the indictment and recorded in the police offense reports. This appeal is brought from the trial court's denial of his requested relief.
We affirm.
Luster was indicted under the Texas Controlled Substances Act (“Act”) for the offense of illegal investment which is codified in Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.126(a)(2) (Vernon 1992). The indictment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Earls v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Coalition of Cities for Affordable Utility RatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Reeves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schleuter v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Schneider v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- City of El Paso v. Alvarez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.