Legal Opinion
Veney v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 16, 2007No. 04-CF-353, 06-CO-543PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On consideration of appellant’s petition to amend opinion, and the opposition thereto; and it appearing that appellant is requesting that we amend our August 2, 2007, opinion in this case, 929 A.2d 448 (D.C.2007), in what he describes as “one important, but ultimately not outcome determinative, respect,” the court enters this order. In sum, appellant asks that we amend the opinion to rely solely on a plain error analysis to resolve the question whether the trial court violated his Confrontation Clause rights by allowing a forensic DNA examiner with the Federal Bureau of Investigation to…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re MeltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Roberts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Hood v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- CHARLES S. TURNER,CHRISTOPHER D. TURNER,RUSSELL L. OVERTON, LEVY ROUSE, CLIFTON E. YARBOROUGH, KELVIN D. SMITH, & TIMOTHY CATLETTDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re A.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.