Legal Opinion
The Golden Rod
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 30, 1907No. Nos. 121, 122PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. . ..
1Opinion of the Court
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
The claims in these two causes are against the vessel whose situation we discussed in the opinion in Consolidation Coal Co. v. The Golden Rod (handed down herewith) 151 Fed. 6. They arose while the vessel was in the possession of Durlacher, with Bliven actually or technically on board as the representative of Watt.
There is no question hére of any lien under general maritime law since the work and materials were furnished in New York City, the home port of the vessel. The libelants rely solely on the statute of the state of New York (Laws 1897, pp. 526, 527, c. 418, as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The IrisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
- Electro-Dynamic Co. v. The ElectronCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
- The Golden RodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- Hubbard v. ThompsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1882
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rupert CityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
- Grays Harbor Stevedore Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1924
- Newell v. Arizona Board of RegentsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- The StrohnDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1911