Legal Opinion

Hughes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 18, 1910No. A-62PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Muskogee County Court; W. C. Jackson, Judge., W. L. Hughes and M. C. Simmons were convicted of a violation of the prohibition law, and appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

FURMAN, PRESIDING Judge.

The counsel for defendant filed an admirable brief in this case. The counsel for the state has filed the following confession of error:

“Comes now the state of Oklahoma by its attorney, Fred S. Caldwell, and represents to'this honorable court that at pages 1 and 2 of the record the charging part of the information upon which plaintiffs in error were prosecuted in the trial court appears in words and figures as follows: ‘That the said W. L. Hughes and M. C. Simmons, retail apothecaries in the county of Muskogee, state of Oklahoma, on the 24th day of October, 1908, did…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McMinn v. WhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Fletcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Titsworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Banks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Hendrix v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Heacock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Farley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Guiaccimo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Manning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API