Legal Opinion
Thomas B. Bishop Co. v. Santa Barbara County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 18, 1938No. 8532PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
The appellant sued in ejectment to recover a parcel of land claimed to have been included in a patent from the United States, granting to its predecessor the Rancho Los Dos Pueblos in Santa Barbara County, California. This appeal was taken from an adverse judgment.
The trial court made findings, including as part of them the patent and the plat of survey of the Rancho. The evidence, aside from the patent and plat, is not before us, and thus the sole question presented is whether the conclusions of law and judgment are supported by the findings. The land involved is a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Mitchell v. SmaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Scott v. LattigSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Niles v. Cedar Point ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. 100 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Willis W. Ritter v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. 100 Acres Of Land, More Or Less, In Marin County, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Charles J. Schwarz, and Fremont C. WollerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Grainger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.