Legal Opinion

Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty P.C. v. Indiana Insurance

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2000No. 71S03-9806-CV-359PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

What fee must an employer or its worker’s compensation insurance carrier pay the attorney who represents an injured employee in a suit against third-party tort-feasors? The Indiana law firm of Span- gler, Jennings & Dougherty appears to desire one-third of the amount already paid by the carrier, plus one-third of the amount collected from third-party tortfea-sors but not reimbursed to the carrier, plus one-third of future medical expenses the carrier would have paid but for the tort recovery. We conclude otherwise.

I. Factual Background and Procedural History

In December…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Evans v. Yankeetown Dock Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Indiana State Highway Commission v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Walker v. State, Muscatatuck State Development CenterIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Castillo v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Bayer v. Panduit Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Kornelik v. Mittal Steel USA, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Estate of Carter v. SzymczakIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Rassbach v. AlcalaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API