Legal Opinion
Castillo v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 19, 2005No. 46A03-0503-CV-118PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATHIAS, Judge.
Enrique Castillo ("Castillo") was seriously injured while a passenger in an automobile driven by Alberto Moreno ("Moreno"), who was insured by Prudential Property and Casualty Company ("Prudential"). During litigation in Illinois, Castillo settled his claims against Moreno for Moreno's policy limits of $50,000. As part of that settlement, the parties agreed to have an Indiana court decide Castillo's uninsured motorist ("UIM") claim against Prudential. The LaPorte Superior Court granted summary judgment in favor of Prudential and against Castillo. Castillo now appeals.
We…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Tate v. Secura InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Beam v. Wausau Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. BolesIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Bosecker v. Westfield InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Tom-Wat, Inc. v. FinkIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wagner v. YatesIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Darliss Wert and Gary Wert v. Meridian Security Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Grange Insurance Co. v. GrahamIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Barnes v. McCartyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. McNealDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.