Legal Opinion

Williams v. Gratton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1931PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

In support of his petition for attorney fees, Mr. Seabrook testified:

“Q. And you have stated in your petition that you have performed certain services in connection with the trust created under the will of the late Isaac Gratton. For the record would you just state briefly to the court the nature and character of the services, and how you came to be engaged in those services on behalf of the estate and of the trust! A. Yes. Paul J. Gratton, the only son and heir of the decedent, employed me, at least he came to me and asked me to represent him in a suit which had been commenced in this court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McIntire v. McIntireSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Re Faling EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Forman v. Sewerage & Water BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  4. Johnson v. HelmerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Chicago, St. Charles & Mississippi Railroad v. LarnedIllinois Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Becht v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. In Re Baxter's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State Land Board v. SovenkoOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Bennett v. LundellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API