Legal Opinion

(PC) Eiland v. Sacramento County Main Jail Medical Facility

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 3, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01042Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RODNEY CHARLES EILAND, No. 2:18-cv-1042 MCE KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 I. Introduction 19 Plaintiff is a former jail inmate, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 20 U.S.C. § 1983, and is proceeding in forma pauperis. The motion for summary judgment filed by 21 defendants Walton, erroneously sued as “Walden,” and Tam is before the court. As discussed 22 below, defendants’ motion…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API