Anglin v. Anglin
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
(dissenting). However it may be characterized, the majority holds that under Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (1) (c) neither a separation action nor a separation judgment dissolves the marital economic partnership so as to terminate the accrual of marital assets for equitable distribution (see, majority opn, at 556-557). Thus, even though the marriage relationship has deteriorated to the point where one party has sued for and even obtained "a judgment separating the parties from bed and board, forever, or for a limited time” (Domestic Relations Law § 200), the individual assets of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Price v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Ferres v. City of New RochelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Milbrandt v. A.P. Green Refractories Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.