Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kimmins Corp. v. Truc

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 17, 2006No. 1D05-4375Published

1Concurrence

ERVIN, J.,

specially concurring.

The employer/carrier (E/C) appeals from a workers’ compensation order ruling that a verified petition for attorney’s fees and costs dated October 9, 1998, was still pending as of an attorney-fee hearing held on January 26, 2005, which appears to be a case of first impression. I concur with the majority in affirming the order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC).

Claimant was injured in 1992, and the E/C voluntarily provided workers’ compensation benefits. On June 14, 1997, claimant’s attorney and the E/C entered into a joint stipulation stating, inter alia,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lukowsky v. Hauser & Metsch, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Amendments to the Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  3. Truc v. Kimmins Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Brown v. US Sugar Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Cincinnati Equitable Ins. Co. v. HawitDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API