Webster v. John Clark, Son & Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Duval ■county. The facta of the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Mabry, J.:
Defendants in error as partners under the firm name ■of John Clark, Son & Co., sued plaintiff in error and E. Rigney as late partners doing business in the firm name of E. Rigney & Co., in an action of assumpsit for goods sold and delivered to the latter firm by the former. Webster interposed pleas that he ivas never indebted as alleged, and that he was not a partner of Rigney under the firm name and style of E. Rigney & Co., as set up in the declaration. Rigney did not defend. A trial before a referee resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiffs below against defendants Webster…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Beecher v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Thompson v. First Nat. Bank of ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Post v. KimberlyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1812
- J. C. Hicks & Co. v. CramSupreme Court of Vermont · 1845
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Orlando Orange Groves Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Scotch Manufacturing Co. v. CarrSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Causten v. BarnetteWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Herman Kahn Co. v. BowdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Tidewater Construction Co. v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.