Legal Opinion
Sunkyong Trading (H.K.) Ltd. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 2, 1992No. B066667PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, P. J.
Petitioners seek a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition to compel Judge Aurelio Munoz (1) to vacate that portion of his April 23, 1992 order severing the cross-complaint against cross-defendant Sunkyong Trading (H.K.) Ltd. (hereinafter SKT) from the action and (2) to transfer the entire lawsuit to Department One for reassignment to another judge. The primary issue in this proceeding is whether the trial court judge, after granting a peremptory challenge by a cross-defendant pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6, had authority to sever the pleading involving that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Pappa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Douglas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Nassif v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Lowe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Home Ins. Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- CYBERMEDIA, INC. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- The Home Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Gil v. MansanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.