Legal Opinion

Richmond MacHinery Co. v. Bennett

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1924No. 2636PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It was duty of court to order consolidation. All liens should be disposed of in one action. Law contemplates all claimants shall be brought in and their rights determined in one proceeding. Rev. Laws, 2224; Lonkey v. Well, 16 Nev. 277; Daly v. Lahontan Mines Co., 39 Nev. 29.

Lien must be filed not later than fifty days after delivery of material. Rev. Laws, 2217. Period runs from date when last item is actually delivered, regardless of anything else. 27 Cyc. 140; Beatty v. Mills, 45 P. 468.

Complaint and lien notice conveyed impression material was delivered in September when in truth it was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Co. v. HegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Peterson v. Pittsburg Silver Peak Gold Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Gould v. WiseNevada Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Caulfield v. PolkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Pacific Sash & Door Co. v. BumillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Amtech Lighting Services Co. v. Payless Cashways (In Re Payless Cashways, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Holtzman v. BennettNevada Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Nichols v. LevyNevada Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Holtzman v. BennettNevada Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API