Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Scott

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 27, 1929No. 12,240PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

Cqnrad, plaintiff in error, sued Scott and nominal defendants to foreclose the lien of a deed of trust covering Colorado land, dated February 1, 1888, and given to-secure the payment of a certain note for $300, of even date, payable in 5 years with interest thereon at 7 per cent per annum to maturity and thereafter at the rate of 10 per cent per annum. Six defenses were interposed by Scott, all of which, except that of laches, were determined in favor of Conrad. The court held Conrad guilty of laches and dismissed the suit. This writ is prosecuted to review this ruling.

The record discloses…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morgan v. KingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  2. Dubois v. ClarkColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Smith v. MorrillColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. First National Bank v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  5. Stubbs v. McGillisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of CargillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Brown v. the First National Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Smith v. KerrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  4. Norman v. BoyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  5. Landy v. JordanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API