Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Cargill

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 11, 1993No. 91SC738PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey

The court of appeals in In re the Marriage of Cargill and Rollins, 826 P.2d 387 (Colo.App.1991), reversed the judgment of the district court which had reinstated a maintenance award. The court of appeals concluded that the husband’s maintenance obligation terminated upon the remarriage of the wife and could not be revived upon the annulment of that marriage. We granted certiorari and now reverse the court of appeals and remand with directions. We hold that, while an annulment of a marriage does not automatically reinstate a maintenance obligation from a previous marriage as a matter of law,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Gaines v. JacobsenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Sefton v. SeftonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Peters v. PetersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. Colo. Dept. of Soc. Serv. v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RSSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Staudenmayer v. StaudenmayerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. In Re the Marriage of IkelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  3. In Re the Marriage of WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Cedar Lane Investments v. American Roofing Supply of Colorado Springs, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Silverview at Overlook, LLC v. Overlook at Mt. Crested Butte Ltd. Liability Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API