Legal Opinion
James Edward Larkins v. Hudson Waterways Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 6, 1981No. 78-2578PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant Larkins seeks wages allegedly owed to him by appellee Hudson Waterways Corporation, along with penalties under 46 U.S.C. § 596 for refusal to pay those wages. A United States Magistrate found that Larkins was not entitled to claimed overtime' pay and to wages lost while he pursued his claims against Hudson. The magistrate also found that Larkins was not entitled to double wages as a penalty for Hudson’s refusal to pay him wages which Hudson admittedly owed to him. The magistrate’s opinion was adopted by the district court. Larkins appeals the decision. We affirm.
THE FACTS
On October…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- U. S. Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. ArguellesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Collie v. FergussonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- McCrea v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Nathaniel Thomas v. Ss Santa Mercedes and Prudential Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Dominic B. Arguelles v. U. S. Bulk Carriers, Inc., a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mateo v. M/S KISODistrict Court, N.D. California · 1991
- Gerassimos Vinieris v. Byzantine Maritime CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Daniel Henry v. S/s Bermuda Star, Etc., Ramon Rodriguez Alvarez v. Bahama Cruise Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Mateo v. M/S KISODistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.