Legal Opinion

Sidener v. Russell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 4, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Massac County; the Hon. R. W. McCabtney, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtReeves, P. J.

The declaration alleges that the defendant, on the 21st, 22d, 23d, 24th and 25tli days of November, 1885, at the county of Massac, etc., went and appeared as a member of the grand jury, then in regular session, before such grand jury, and falsely and maliciously and without any reasonable cause whatever charged the plaintiff with having wilfully, corruptly and falsely sworn in a matter material to the issue in a certain suit before one Charles Barefield, a justice of the peace, in said county, in which suit the said Andrew Sidener was plaintiff, and George W. Russell, the plaintiff herein,was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Turpen v. BoothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Hunter v. MathisIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Ullman v. AbramsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1873

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cooper v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. United States v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
  3. Irwin v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Phelps v. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  5. United States v. ChaplinDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API