Legal Opinion

Belsher v. Russell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 20, 1928No. 6 Div. 115Published

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

The main question involved in this appeal is whether or not the order or decree of 1874 of the probate court of Choctaw county, Ala., reciting a sale of the land by the administrator, the report of the same, and the payment of the purchase money, and directing the administrator to make a deed to the purchaser, operated, in and of itself, in the absence of a deed, as col- or of title.

While, under the statute as it existed in 1874, the execution of a deed was essential to vest the legal title in the purchaser (Comer v. Hart, 79 Ala. 389), yet the order gave the purchaser a complete equitable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Neal v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Neal v. . NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Mobile & Girard Railroad v. CogsbillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. MathisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Comer v. HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API