Legal Opinion

Neal v. . Nelson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1895PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The court submitted, by consent of the parties, the issues as follows, to-wit: "Is the plaintiff the owner of and entitled to the possession of the land described in the complaint?" Answer: "Yes."

The plaintiff introduced in evidence a grant from the State to one McAnally and evidence of surveyors and others tending to show that it embraced the land in dispute. And a deed from W. H. Gentry, Sheriff, to William Lash, Sr., purporting to bear date 2 November, 1869, attached to which deed was a survey purporting to be dated in December, 1871, and recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Barger v. HobbsIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Bell v. LongworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Avent v. ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Walker v. Miller.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Henderson County v. OsteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Whitley v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. McAbee v. GerardenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Allgood v. AllgoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. Den-Mark Construction, Inc. v. Wachovia Bank National Ass'n (In Re Den-Mark Construction, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API