Hansen v. Hough
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Harrison District Court. — Thomas Arthur, Judge. Action on a contract resulted in a verdict for plaintiff, but, on motion of defendant, the verdict was set aside and a new trial ordered. The plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The plaintiff is a machinist, as well as farmer and blacksmith. He became interested in a mail crane defendant claimed to have invented, and at defendant’s request made a model of it for his use and contributed $40 toward the expenses of obtaining a patent. They entered into a contract in words following:
“Contract and conveyance of ownership between James M. Hough, of the first part, and Frederick Hansen, party of the second part, entered into this seventh day of May, 1912, witnesseth that, in consideration of valuable services rendered to me by the said Frederick Hansen, I hereby convey and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. AsburySupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Gordon v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Morgan v. Fremont CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Miller v. Harrison CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sergeant v. Watson Bros. Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Heiman v. FelderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Willis v. SchertzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Miller v. KookerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- State v. DolsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.