Legal Opinion

United States v. Kelso

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided November 19, 1986No. Crim. 84-AR-104-NEPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ACKER, District Judge.

Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered by this court on November 7, 1986, in United States v. Tucker, et al., 646 F.Supp. 1543 (N.D.Ala.1986), United States v. Kelso was called for trial on November 13, 1986, upon the heels of the trial of United States v. Creekmore, in which the United States, at the hands of the jury, obtained a conviction of Creek-more for conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(2)(B). When called upon to prosecute Kelso, the Government reiterated its refusal to prosecute as already set forth in the notice it filed on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Lenwood Lewis White, United States of America v. Terry Joe Tucker, United States of America v. William Johnny Mason, Roger David Handley, David Lee Kelso, and Ray Winford Steele, United States of America v. William David Riccio, United States of America v. Ricky Lynn Creekmore, United States of America v. David Lee KelsoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API