Legal Opinion

Nur v. Blake Development Corp.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided February 6, 1987No. S85-147PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

MILLER, District Judge.

This cause comes before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as against plaintiffs Mike Keen and Gini Burns. Alternatively, the defendants seek summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The matter has been fully briefed and is ripe for decision.

I

The parties have presented, and the court will consider, matters outside the pleadings. Accordingly, the court shall treat the defendants’ motion as one for summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b).

(A)

In a summary judgment motion, the mov-ant must first…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Glenwood Intermountain Properties, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1995
  2. Nur v. Blake Development Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API