Legal Opinion
Westervelt v. McCullough
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 1923No. Civ. No. 4403PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal, which was tak^ri from an order denying a motion made by defendant in the trial court under section 663 of the Code of Civil Procedure, namely, a motion in that court to set aside its judgment, amend its conclusions of law, and enter another and different judgment. No appeal has been taken from the judgment. Respondent claims that an order denying a motion to set aside the judgment and to enter another and different judgment is not an appealable order. Hence her motion to dismiss this appeal.
An order denying a motion made under section 663 is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Condon v. DonohueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Modoc Co-Operative Assn. v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wynn v. Monterey ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Westervelt v. McCulloughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- California Delta Farms, Inc. v. Chinese American Farms, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Hancock v. California Newspaper Publishers' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.