Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Dark

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 4, 1995No. 95-164PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

The issue in this appeal is whether the circuit court erred in setting aside only the damages awarded as part of a default judgment. Appellants Neal Byrd and Wanda Byrd assert that the circuit court did err for multiple reasons, including lack of authority under Ark. R. Civ. R 55(c) to rehear the issue of damages, while leaving the default on the issue of liability intact. We agree that the court did not have the authority to set aside the damages award under Rule 55(c), and we reverse and remand.

The facts in this case are gleaned from the complaint filed by the Byrds…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. B & F ENGINEERING, INC. v. CotroneoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Morrison v. LoweSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Divelbliss v. SuchorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Dickson v. Delhi Seed Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  5. McNair v. McNairSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bowden v. Caldor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Volunteer Transport, Inc. v. HouseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Tharp v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Williams v. First Unum Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Jean-Pierre v. Plantation Homes of Crittenden County, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API