Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Eadie v. Noyo Lumber Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1893No. 15110PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the.Superior Court of Sonoma County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Action to cancel a patent issued by the state of California, in 1876, to A. W. Macpherson for certain lands in Mendocino County.

It is alleged in the complaint that the lands in question are agricultural lands which were listed to the state February 15, 1870, in lieu of a section 36, that section then supposed to be within the exterior limits of a reservation, but subsequently ascertained to be excluded therefrom; that said selection was confirmed to the state by the provisions of the act of Congress approved March 1, 1877, entitled, “An act relating to indemnity school selections in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BlankenshipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Cucamonga Fruit-Land Co. v. MoirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Rooker v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Durand v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Martin v. DurandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. CeballosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Fleishhacker v. BlumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  4. People ex rel. Lynch v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. People v. Kings County Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API